A blog developing a corpus of short films, originally in conjunction with Professor Jeffrey Middents' course Literature 346/646, "Short Films," at American University during Summer 2006, Fall 2008 and Fall 2011.
Thursday, November 20, 2008
Jurassic Park (Sweded)
"Oh shit," I can hear you sighing to yourself upon discovering that there is such a thing as SwededFilms.com, "I am probably going to waste my entire night watching these things." Sorry in advance.
A sweded film is, according to Urban Dictionary, a "summarized recreation of popular pop-culture films using limited budgets and a camcorder." The swede phenomenon emerged as a tribute to Michel Gondry's 2008 classic (for in the viral age, the gestation period for determining what is to be "classic" is as brief as its viewer's attention spans) Be Kind Rewind. The movie is about two video store clerks (played Jack Black and Mos Def) who accidentally erase a bunch of videotapes and then re-film the lost movies using inventive -- if laughably cheap -- methods. Fans of the film began uploading their own swedes (named such because the characters lie to their customers and tell them the films were made in Sweden) to sites like Youtube, and shortly thereafter SwededFilms.com was born and the swede movement adopted a code of aesthetics all its own.
Swedes are fueled not by funding but by ingenuity and an embrace of the limitations of their form. A good swede wears its budget on its sleeve; it tries to find the cheapest and most amateurish-on-purpose way of filming things like special effects, iconic characters and memorable (and often convoluted) plots. As with any genre, conventions develop quickly. Extra points are always won for clumsy, a-capella renditions of famous instrumental soundtracks. And referring to characters by their actor's name is always good for a laugh (one of my favorite lines in the above Jurassic Park swede is "Jeff Goldblume, freeze!").
The best swedes are the ones that understand the fidgety attention span of the average Youtube enthusiast and cater to it with rapid-fire cutting. That's what I like so much about this particular Jurassic Park swede. It's not the only Jurassic Park swede on the internet, mind you (as evidenced by Youtube user MrFGC1's comment "Best Jurassic Park Sweded on youtube"; high praise indeed), but I think the editing in this one shows the filmmaker's intimate understanding of the form, which is critical to a successful swede. The editing is purposefully hyper-continuous, in that it assumes we are all so familiar with the plot of Jurassic Park that we could recite it in our sleep. The sweded Jurassic Park uses fragments of the intimately familiar and creates an entirely new text that makes our familiarity a punchline in itself. That we "get it" is contingent upon us being as familiar with Jurassic Park as the filmmakers are.
But the biggest joke of all, and one common of all swedes, is one about the relationship between shorts and features. Can we take a two-hour blockbuster and condense it into a short that lasts only 5 minutes? 3 minutes? 2? The shorter duration in which a swede can tell a complicated story, the funnier it is. True, every swede is innately indebted to the film that inspired it, so we could say that this is yet another way in which shorts are viewed as subordinate to features. But I actually see an up-with-shorts mentality present in the swede phenomenon: within less than a year of their existence, swedes have adopted a language and a code of content so much their own that I actually think you can watch a good swede and, without having seen the original feature, find tremendous enjoyment in it. It's an homage to the inherent brevity of the short. It's a celebration of montage in ways that Eisenstein never dreamed.
This reminded me a bit of the 30 second bunny videos we watched all those weeks ago, and I liked it for the exact same reasons. Its interesting to see how funny a great movie can be when its boiled down to exaggerated versions of its most memorable moments.
ReplyDeleteNo Jack Black, so I'm not watching it.
ReplyDeleteJurassic park is great. I would rather see the original, though, because I if Jack Black isn't in it, Jeff Goldblume better be.
ReplyDeleteLord knows Lindsay and I watched this about ten times the first night we found it online. But more importantly, it sums up everything that I remember from Jurassic Park: when people are eaten by dinos and "Clever girl." We condense movies, either ones we love, marginally remember, or hate, into moments, and use this moments to summarize a whole. Think of Bravo's "100 Scariest Movie Moments" or the countless moment-related lists at filmsite.org. When we forget to mention the scenes around these mentioned moments, are we discounting their existence? SHOOT HER.
ReplyDeleteAnd for the love of "Raines," it's Jeff Goldblum.
I agree with Drew on how we condense movies. We basically convert every long (feature) film in to a short film in our long term memory.
ReplyDeleteI cried with laughter when I saw this. My favorite prop is the toy helicopter.
ReplyDeleteI think this sort of thing appeals to us so much because we all secretly want to be awesome filmmakers, and when someone can successfully be so hilariously terrible/DIY about it, it gives us hope. It brings the medium back to the masses.
This one is hilarious, but I watched some of the other "sweded" films on the site and they were just bad-bad, not good-bad. I think the key to being funny is the fast editing and the fact that all the actors were pretty committed to what they're doing (as well as the Jeff Goldblum impression), whereas in the others there's a lot of awkward silences and scenes that drag on just a liiiiittle too long because the people making them aren't as sure of what they're doing. When you're doing something intentionally low budget and bad, you still have to have some skills to make it watchable.
ReplyDeleteAlli, I totally agree with that. There are some swedes on that site that last about 9 minutes, and that pretty much guarantees that they will be awful. The whole point of the aesthetic is to make sure you're not leaving an image on screen for more than about 3 or 4 seconds, so it just ruins it when people don't get that. I find I get bored halfway through most of the longer ones and end up shutting them off.
ReplyDeletelindy, great analysis here, you know we all love these little sweded things. I think the idea of embracing the limitations or even creating limitations that show up on the final film is an interesting concept...clever girl!
ReplyDeleteAnyone posting that hasn't seen Jurassic Park/or do you think this film would still be funny to people who haven't seen the original?
ReplyDelete